Metered, not modelled

Cambridge vs Kilmarnock & Ayrshire

Cambridge roofs made about 29% more than Kilmarnock & Ayrshire roofs last year.

871 against 677 kWh per kWp at the median, from 416 and 83 real systems.

CB

Cambridge

871 median kWh per kWp

middle half 803–928 · 416 systems · 2nd of 49

KA

Kilmarnock & Ayrshire

677 median kWh per kWp

middle half 618–731 · 83 systems · 49th of 49

Where the two actually overlap

Both areas, grouped by what each system made. The medians differ, but the shapes sit largely on top of one another — a good Kilmarnock & Ayrshire roof beats a poor Cambridge one comfortably. Location moves the odds; it does not decide the outcome.

Cambridge: the middle half of 416 systems made 803–928 kWh per kWp. Kilmarnock & Ayrshire: the middle half of 83 systems made 618–731 kWh per kWp.

Both figures are what real systems metered last year, so the gap mixes sunlight with system age, roof direction and shading. It is the difference in what people actually got, not a difference in sunshine alone.

Two certified installers fitting a solar panel on a tiled UK roof
Free roof check · no sign-up

Is your roof right for solar?

Enter your postcode and we'll estimate your roof's direction, its solar potential, and show certified installers covering your area.

  • Every installer is certified

Output figures from openclimatefix/uk_pv (Hugging Face, CC-BY-4.0), collected by Sheffield Solar. How we measure.